| 7:00 |
Continental Breakfast & Conference Registration |
| |
|
|
| 8:00 |
Welcome Address |
| |
| |
Priya Pandian
Executive Director
Performance Based Logistics 2008 |
|
|
|
| 8:05 |
Chairperson’s Opening Address |
| |
|
|
| 8:20 |
Anticipating And Delivering Resources To Support Critical Warfighter Needs Using Performance Based Logistics |
| |
 |
Major General Vincent E. Boles
Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff, G4
US Army |
|
The Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4 enhances soldier logistics readiness by providing integrated policies and programs to maintain a ready Army that can be sustained in the joint operating environment. Contributing to the three priorities of the G4, performance-based logistics can help ensure higher resource availability and sustainability – empowering the Army to better meet the needs of its soldiers.
- Evaluating how performance-based logistics are used to meet
the Army G-4's three priorities: 360o readiness, logistics
automation and logistics transformation
- Identifying strategic operational initiatives designed to create
a PBL receptive environment in the Army
- Outlining current PBL milestones to manage future PBL-based
defense acquisition programs
|
|
| 9:00 |
Buying A Performance End-State: PBL Successes In The Navy |
| |
| |
Cmdr. Andrea Lemon
Director of Integrated Logistics Support, NAVICP - Philadelphia
US Navy |
|
This brief provides an overview of the pioneering PBL programs at the Naval Inventory Control Point. The NAVICP PBL strategy has achieved greatly enhanced warfighter support through performance based contracts, providing dramatic improvements in availability, drastic reductions in logistics response times and the near elimination of backorders and awaiting parts problems. Under PBL at NAVICP, the Navy is buying a performance “end-state”. In lieu of individual parts or supplies, the Navy is buying a comprehensive, performance-based support package with guaranteed availability, improved reliability, obsolescence management and other desired logistics elements. The Navy communicates the specific outcome and industry figures out the best way to deliver it. This presentation will also include an overview of PBL enablers (long-term contracts, Navy Working Capital Fund), affordability (“break-even or better” requirement), “Why PBL Works”, examples of PBL successes and a summary of PBL keys to success. |
|
| 9:40 |
PANEL SESSION: Examining The Impact Of The 50-50 Rule: Why Private-Public Partnerships Are More Important Than Ever |
| |
 |
Alvin Hopkins
Deputy Director
Apache Program
US Army |
|
 |
John D. Gumbel
Public-Private Partnering Lead
Naval Integrated Logistics
Boeing |
 |
 |
James H. Beggs
Senior Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton |
 |
The 50-50 rule denotes that up to 50 percent of the annual funds made available to a military department for depot-level maintenance and repair may be used to contract this work to nonfederal government personnel. Despite its importance, many services continue to struggle to comply with the 50-50 rule, resulting in billions of dollars in lost funding. This panel will provide you with an avenue to focus on how to overcome the challenges that are impeding progress in public-private partnerships and how to make these partnerships more palatable in the future.
- Employing competent strategies to build open communication
channels between military depot maintenance teams and their
private counterparts
- Managing a private enterprise to respond quickly and
effectively in wartime crisis, while maintaining a military
workforce that is knowledgeable in armament maintenance
- Capitalizing on private industry efficiencies to minimize
resource use
- Sharing best practices: Understanding how to find and
maintain relationships where all parties complement each
other to the fullest
|
|
| 10:20 |
Refreshment Break & Networking Opportunity In The Solutions Zone |
| |
|
|
| 10:50 |
Ao to PO: Linking Daily Inventory Decisions to High-Level Outcomes |
| |
 |
Ted Anderson
VP Marketing
Click Commerce |
 |
 |
Don Miller
Program Manager-DLA Aircraft Tire Privatization Initiative
Lockheed Martin – MS2 |
 |
During this case study session, Click Commerce will explore how PBL contractors can best answer the everyday real world questions of “What do I buy, transfer, or repair? When? Where?” In light of their overall contractual goals and constraints. Examples from both current and planned PBL contracts will be presented. |
|
| 11:30 |
PANEL SESSION: Minimizing The Costs Of Proposal Writing And Providing Defense Partners With Solutions To Streamline The Process |
| |
 |
Rod Skotty
President
Maritime Helicopter Support Company, LLC |
 |
| |
Dave Maas
Autonomic Logistics Program Manager, F-35 Radar & EO DAS
Northrop Grumman Corporation |
 |
Although PBL strategies have been implemented to reduce costs for both industry and defense groups, the proposal process remains burdensome and expensive. This panel will allow successful industry leaders to discuss some best practices for understanding how to address defense proposals and provide their defense counterparts with suggestions to ensure that the process moving forward is effectively streamlined.
- Examining the best methods of gaining information to understand
how to best support the warfighter through their program
- Analyzing the most critical performance factors to discuss in
your program proposal and structuring the document to
highlight company's outstanding capabilities
- Proposing some points improvement for defense colleagues
that could help create a smoother proposal process
|
|
| 12:10 |
Lunch For All Conference Attendees |
| |
|
|
| 1:10 |
Entrepreneurial Logistics: A Performance Strategy For Post Production Support |
| |
 |
Dr. Joe B. Hanna
Chair and Professor of Supply Chain Management Department of
Aviation and Supply Chain Management College of Business
Auburn University |
|
 |
Dr. Wesley S. Randall
Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management Department of
Aviation and Supply Chain Management College of Business
Auburn University |
|
Despite continued budget decreases, many defense programs struggle to fully implement incentives contracting strategies, causing financial losses on both the military and the industry sides. This session will show how performance based logistics drives innovative solutions to recurring problems, capitalizing on an existing knowledge base to ensure long-term program viability.
- Understanding why you should expect that a performance strategy will generate solutions today that are superior to the solution of yesterday
- Sustaining a performance network through knowledge generation, dissemination and entrepreneurial decision making
- Evaluating how cost and price based approaches contend with each other in a performance strategy
|
|
| 1:50 |
DLA Partnerships With Military Services In Performance Based Logistics |
| |
 |
Yvette Burke
Executive Director
Aviation Contracting and Acquisition Management,
Defense Supply Command Richmond
Defense Logistics Agency |
 |
The Defense Logistic Agency focuses on helping civilian organizations and defense groups with the best logistics solutions to provide the American warfighter with the most dependable support. Amongst the DLA’s many initiatives, its Depot Level Reparables program will help defense programs move towards implementing reliability as a key performance parameter.
- Evaluating the importance of a strong business case analysis and how it can help establish a stronger PBL program
- Sharing the DLA plans for the new Depot Level Reparables for the services and how this could help your program
- Understanding DLA initiatives with the Joint Supplier Scorecard and how this can improve efficiency in your program
|
|
| 2:30 |
Refreshment Break & Networking Opportunity In The Solutions Zone |
| |
|
|
| |
Concurrent Tracks |
| |
MILITARY INTERACTIVE FORUM |
| 3:00 |
Standardizing The Guidance: Creating A PBL Policy Implementation Guideline Plan |
| |
 |
Michael Osborne
Vice President, Education
Council of Logistics Engineering Professionals |
 |
 |
Michael Connor
Senior Logistics Analyst
(DASA (ILS)) Policy Directorate, US Army |
|
 |
Jan Mulligan
Department Chief of Depot Maintenance Management Division
US Air Force |
|
 |
Michael Hartwell
Associate Director for Program Management, Integrated Material
Management Center, US Army |
|
 |
Dave Reed
Deputy PBL Policy Director
NAVAIR, US Navy |
|
| |
Eileen Giglio
Assistant Deputy Under Secretary, Strategic Plans and Initiatives
Office of the Secretary of Defense |
|
Although logisticians agree that performance based logistics is the preferred contracting method of the DoD, there remains confusion and inconsistency in the implementation of these policies into successful, cost-effective programs. This unique session will allow you to participate in ground-breaking roundtable discussions with your colleagues to describe where policy gaps impede the progress of incentives contracting processes in defense acquisition programs. Moderating these discussions will be PBL policy experts from each of the services and distinguished panelists from the Office of the Secretary of Defense offering direct feedback to your questions and concerns. These representatives will then summarize these strategy gaps and lead a discussion, evaluating how to create new guidance policies where none currently exist.
- Discuss the pain points for you and your peers as they relate to the implementation of performance based logistics. Which processes still require additional guidance?
- Gain insight into the initiatives and strategies used by peers in other services to counter these challenges
- Provide recommendations to the defense policy group to guide them towards the areas that are creating the greatest hurdles for effective implementation of performance based logistics
|
|
| |
INDUSTRY SESSION |
| 3:00 |
What Are The Key Elements Of A PBL Contract And Why? |
| |
 |
Robert L. Houston
Vice President Performance Based
Logistics and Support
BAE Systems |
 |
As industry aligns itself to best support its defense customers, it is imperative that OEM executives be fully versed on the integral elements of a success PBL contract. This brief will inform defense manufacturing groups on the most effective tactics to ensure consistent customer satisfaction in this complex acquisition strategy.
- Define the cost baseline and key elements that drive that cost and underlie the industry contract offer
- Create a clear delineation of the government customer
- Identify the performance standard that is to be met
- Accurately assess the condition of the PBL product, system or fleet under PBL performance contract
|
|
| 4:00 |
Cocktail Reception For All Conference Attendees |
| |
|
|